Dr. Vinod Shankar Chauhan vs The State of Bihar — MJC/1575/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010676182022

e-Filing Number

20-08-2022

Filing Number

MJC/15710/2022

Filing Date

22-Aug-2022

Registration No

MJC/1575/2022

Registration Date

24-Aug-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dr. Vinod Shankar Chauhan

    Adv. Siddharth Harsh,Shadwal Harsh,Shadwal Harsh, ,Shadwal Harsh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.K. Senthil Kumar,

  3. 3.Shailesh Kumar,

  4. 4.Kameshwar Nath Tiwary,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Dr. Vinod Shankar Chauhan's contempt petition against Bihar Health Department officials for alleged willful disobedience of a 2010 court order was disposed of after the court found that appropriate steps and payment directions had been taken by the respondents. The court dismissed the contempt proceedings and permitted the petitioner to pursue any remaining grievances through a fresh writ petition if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2023

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 22-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/1575/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Dr. Vinod Shankar Chauhan's contempt petition against Bihar Health Department officials for alleged willful disobedience of a 2010 court order was disposed of after the court found that appropriate steps and payment directions had been taken by the respondents. The court dismissed the contempt proceedings and permitted the petitioner to pursue any remaining grievances through a fresh writ petition if necessary. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case