Yatindra Kishore Kushwaha, vs The State of Bihar — MJC/1831/2021

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,11,12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010673192021

e-Filing Number

22-09-2021

Filing Number

MJC/16092/2021

Filing Date

22-Sep-2021

Registration No

MJC/1831/2021

Registration Date

25-Sep-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,11,12
Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Yatindra Kishore Kushwaha,

    Adv. Ayush Kumar,Ranjeet Kumar,Ranjeet Kumar, Yogesh Kumar,Ranjeet Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.Smt. Bandana Preyashi,The Additional Chief Secretary, Co-Operative Department,

  3. 3.Sri Rajesh Meena,The Registrat, Co-operative Societies, Co-operative Department,

  4. 4.Sri Amit Kumar, The District Co-operative Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by Yatindra Kishore Kushwaha against Bihar Co-operative Department officials, finding that while the previous court order from January 29, 2020 had been complied with, the petitioner's underlying grievance remained unaddressed. The court granted the petitioner liberty to file further proceedings if any grievance persisted, disposing of the contempt petition without initiating contempt proceedings against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Apr-2022

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 22-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/1831/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The Patna High Court disposed of a contempt petition filed by Yatindra Kishore Kushwaha against Bihar Co-operative Department officials, finding that while the previous court order from January 29, 2020 had been complied with, the petitioner's underlying grievance remained unaddressed. The court granted the petitioner liberty to file further proceedings if any grievance persisted, disposing of the contempt petition without initiating contempt proceedings against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case