Nilam Devi vs The State of Bihar through the Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation — MJC/1952/2023

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010668382023

e-Filing Number

13-07-2023

Filing Number

MJC/14753/2023

Filing Date

19-Jul-2023

Registration No

MJC/1952/2023

Registration Date

21-Jul-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12
Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Nilam Devi

    Adv. Baidya Nath Thakur

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar through the Administrator, Bihar State Road Transport Corporation

  2. 2.Mr. Sanjay Kumar Agarwal,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: Nilam Devi filed a contempt petition against the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation and its Administrator alleging willful disobedience of a court order dated 04.02.2021 from an earlier civil writ case. On 05-05-2026, the Patna High Court (Justice Rajiv Roy) disposed of the contempt petition after the petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal, allowing the case to be withdrawn as requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2024

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 19-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/1952/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Nilam Devi filed a contempt petition against the Bihar State Road Transport Corporation and its Administrator alleging willful disobedience of a court order dated 04.02.2021 from an earlier civil writ case. On 05-05-2026, the Patna High Court (Justice Rajiv Roy) disposed of the contempt petition after the petitioner's counsel requested withdrawal, allowing the case to be withdrawn as requested. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case