Ram Yash Sah vs The State of Bihar — MJC/2397/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010630012019

Filing Number

MJC/21022/2019

Filing Date

26-Jun-2019

Registration No

MJC/2397/2019

Registration Date

26-Jun-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ram Yash Sah

    Adv. Jai Prakash Verma

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.Sri Chanchal Kumar

  3. 3.Sri Yogendra Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Ram Yash Sah, a superannuated Junior Electric Engineer, filed a contempt petition against Bihar state officials for alleged willful disobedience of a May 22, 2015 court order. The Patna High Court dismissed the petition on May 5, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel stated the matter had become infructuous and requested withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Apr-2020

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha

  4. 16-Mar-2020

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha

  5. 02-Mar-2020

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha

  6. 24-Feb-2020

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Prabhat Kumar Jha

  7. 17-Feb-2020

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 26-Jun-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/2397/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Ram Yash Sah, a superannuated Junior Electric Engineer, filed a contempt petition against Bihar state officials for alleged willful disobedience of a May 22, 2015 court order. The Patna High Court dismissed the petition on May 5, 2026, after the petitioner's counsel stated the matter had become infructuous and requested withdrawal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case