Dinesh Prasad Yadav vs The State of Bihar — MJC/2123/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th June 2026.
CNR: BRHC010622672025
e-Filing Number
21-06-2025
Filing Number
MJC/14406/2025
Filing Date
21-Jun-2025
Registration No
MJC/2123/2025
Registration Date
24-Jun-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Coram
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dinesh Prasad Yadav
Adv. Karandeep Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.Sri Saurabh Jorwal, The Collector,
-
3.Sri Prakash Kumar Rajak, The Deputy Collector Land Reforms,
-
4.Sri Gopal Kumar, The Circle Officer, Circle Office Chakia,
-
5.Jogi Mukhiya
-
6.Satendra Mukhiya
-
7.Umesh Mukhiya
-
8.Devilal Mukhiya
-
9.Shailendra Mukhiya
-
10.Ramdev Ray
-
11.Suresh Ray
-
12.Ramphal Ray
-
13.Naresh Ray
-
14.Ramdev Ray
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar ShahView PDF
Case Summary: MJC/2123/2025 The Patna High Court disposed of Dinesh Prasad Yadav's petition concerning public land encroachment in East Champaran district. The court found that a final order under Section 6(1) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 had already been passed by the Circle Officer and the encroachment removed. The court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the Circle Officer if any encroachment persists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
21-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/2123/2025
Case Summary: MJC/2123/2025 The Patna High Court disposed of Dinesh Prasad Yadav's petition concerning public land encroachment in East Champaran district. The court found that a final order under Section 6(1) of the Bihar Public Land Encroachment Act, 1956 had already been passed by the Circle Officer and the encroachment removed. The court granted the petitioner liberty to approach the Circle Officer if any encroachment persists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts