Santoshi Singh vs The State of Bihar Advocate - Additional Solicitor General, Government Advocate ( — CWJC/9190/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 08th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010551992025
e-Filing Number
28-05-2025
Filing Number
CWJC/13455/2025
Filing Date
28-May-2025
Registration No
CWJC/9190/2025
Registration Date
29-May-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh , Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh
Coram
Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh , Mr. Justice Shailendra Singh
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
WORKS CONTRACT - TENDER AND BLACK LISTING ( 15053 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Santoshi Singh
Adv. Girish Pandey,Maheshwar Pandey,Maheshwar Pandey, ,Maheshwar Pandey
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar Advocate - Additional Solicitor General, Government Advocate (
-
2.,Mr. Arvind Kumar (Spl.P.P.Vigilance),Anil Singh,Alok Kumar
-
3.The Chief Secretary,
-
4.The Additional Chief Secretary,
-
5.The Engineer-in-Chief-cum-Additional Collector-cum-Special Secretary,
-
6.The Superintending Engineer,
-
7.The Nodal Officer,
-
8.The Secretary (Technical) to Engineer-in-Chief,
-
9.The Chief Engineer-I (Patna),
-
10.The Engineer-in-Chief,
-
11.The Executive Engineer,
-
12.The Director General of Police,
-
13.The Director General,
-
14.The Additional Director General,
-
15.The Director General,
-
16.The Superintendent of Police,
-
17.Narsingh Singh
Adv. Sanket,Navin Kumar Singh
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,Mr. Justice Shailendra SinghView PDF
-
08-May-2026
Mr. Justice Sudhir Singh,Mr. Justice Shailendra SinghView PDF
Case Summary: CWJC/9190/2025 Santoshi Singh v. State of Bihar & Others The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a tender award by Bihar's Rural Works Department for tender RRSMP/24-25 Chapra-02/01. Rather than deciding the substantive claims, the court found that petitioner Santoshi Singh had submitted a representation/complaint (dated 24.05.2025) to the Engineer-in-Chief that remained pending. The court directed the Engineer-in-Chief to consider and decide the representation within three weeks after affording due hearing to all stakeholders and issuing a reasoned order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Nov-2025
For Admission -I
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha
-
13-Oct-2025
For Orders (On Office Notes)
The Chief Justice , Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha
-
07-Oct-2025
For Orders (On Petitions)
Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri , Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Sinha
-
28-Aug-2025
For Admission IV
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy , The Chief Justice-
-
21-Aug-2025
For Admission IV
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman , The Chief Justice-
-
11-Aug-2025
For Admission IV
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy , The Chief Justice-
-
08-Aug-2025
For Admission IV
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy , The Chief Justice-
-
07-Aug-2025
For Admission III
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy , The Chief Justice-
-
06-Aug-2025
For Admission -I
Mr. Justice Ashutosh Kumar , Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
-
23-Jun-2025
For Admission
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
-
16-Jun-2025
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
04-Jun-2025
For Admission
Mr. Justice Partha Sarthy
-
03-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-May-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/9190/2025
Case Summary: CWJC/9190/2025 Santoshi Singh v. State of Bihar & Others The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition challenging a tender award by Bihar's Rural Works Department for tender RRSMP/24-25 Chapra-02/01. Rather than deciding the substantive claims, the court found that petitioner Santoshi Singh had submitted a representation/complaint (dated 24.05.2025) to the Engineer-in-Chief that remained pending. The court directed the Engineer-in-Chief to consider and decide the representation within three weeks after affording due hearing to all stakeholders and issuing a reasoned order in accordance with law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts