Indrasan Sah vs Sri Tripurari Sharan — MJC/1656/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010544922021

e-Filing Number

18-08-2021

Filing Number

MJC/13590/2021

Filing Date

18-Aug-2021

Registration No

MJC/1656/2021

Registration Date

21-Aug-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Indrasan Sah

    Adv. NISHANT KUMAR SINHA,Ram Kishun Prasad,Ram Kishun Prasad, ,Ram Kishun Prasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sri Tripurari Sharan

  2. 2.Sri Kundan Kumar,

  3. 3.Sri Manish Kumar,

  4. 4.Sri Kumar Prashant,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    The Patna High Court dismissed Indrasan Sah's contempt petition seeking to initiate proceedings against government officials for allegedly disobeying a 23.01.2020 order. The court noted that a committee headed by the District Magistrate, West Champaran had rejected the petitioner's claim via memo dated 01.09.2020, and granted the petitioner liberty to pursue further remedies if grievances remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Jul-2022

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 18-Aug-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/1656/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The Patna High Court dismissed Indrasan Sah's contempt petition seeking to initiate proceedings against government officials for allegedly disobeying a 23.01.2020 order. The court noted that a committee headed by the District Magistrate, West Champaran had rejected the petitioner's claim via memo dated 01.09.2020, and granted the petitioner liberty to pursue further remedies if grievances remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case