Lakshmi Kumari vs The State Of Bihar — MJC/3617/2018
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010541432018
Filing Number
MJC/91668/2018
Filing Date
10-Sep-2018
Registration No
MJC/3617/2018
Registration Date
10-Sep-2018
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lakshmi Kumari
Adv. Arun Kumar,RAM VINAY PD. SINGH,RAM VINAY PD. SINGH, RAM VINAY PD. SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State Of Bihar
Adv. ,Nivedita Nirvikar 1123
-
2.The Director
-
3.The District Education Officer
-
4.The District Programme Officer
-
5.The Accountant General
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: MJC/3617/2018 Lakshmi Kumari filed a contempt petition against Bihar education officials for alleged willful disobedience of a May 4, 2018 court order. The District Education Officer and District Programme Officer submitted a response showing that a committee had rejected the petitioner's claim. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the matter further if her grievance persisted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Dec-2019
Lokadalat ( For Orders )
Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah
-
26-Jun-2019
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay
-
19-Jun-2019
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay
-
08-May-2019
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay
-
29-Apr-2019
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Dr. Anil Kumar Upadhyay
-
26-Mar-2019
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Sep-2018
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/3617/2018
Case Summary: MJC/3617/2018 Lakshmi Kumari filed a contempt petition against Bihar education officials for alleged willful disobedience of a May 4, 2018 court order. The District Education Officer and District Programme Officer submitted a response showing that a committee had rejected the petitioner's claim. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the matter further if her grievance persisted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts