Ram Ratan Singh vs Mr. Pratya Amrit Advocate - Vinay Kirti Singh, ,Nikesh Kumar — MJC/2213/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010540972019

Filing Number

MJC/19197/2019

Filing Date

17-May-2019

Registration No

MJC/2213/2019

Registration Date

17-May-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 10

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ram Ratan Singh

    Adv. Ranjeet Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mr. Pratya Amrit Advocate - Vinay Kirti Singh, ,Nikesh Kumar

  2. 2.Mr. Pratyaya Amrit

  3. 3.Mr. Binodanand Jha

  4. 4.Mr. Vijay Kumar

  5. 5.Mr. Ahmad Khan

  6. 6.Mr. Ahmad Khan

  7. 7.Mr. Praveen Kumar

  8. 8.Mr. Sanjeev Kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: MJC/2213/2019 The Patna High Court disposed of Ram Ratan Singh's contempt petition against Bihar State Electricity Board officials for willfully disobeying a July 4, 2018 court order. The court found that the Bihar State Power Transmission Company had already complied by issuing an order on July 8, 2019 to return the deducted amount to the petitioner, thereby resolving the contempt issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Aug-2019

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 17-May-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/2213/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: MJC/2213/2019 The Patna High Court disposed of Ram Ratan Singh's contempt petition against Bihar State Electricity Board officials for willfully disobeying a July 4, 2018 court order. The court found that the Bihar State Power Transmission Company had already complied by issuing an order on July 8, 2019 to return the deducted amount to the petitioner, thereby resolving the contempt issue. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case