Upendra Kumar Sharma @ Narendra Sharma vs Baby Devi Advocate - Arvind Kumar — MA/403/2024

Case under Family Court Act Section 19. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010531442024

e-Filing Number

16-05-2024

Filing Number

MA/12138/2024

Filing Date

18-May-2024

Registration No

MA/403/2024

Registration Date

19-Jun-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha

Coram

Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha

Category

MISC. APPEAL ( 2 )

Sub-Category

MA (DB) FAMILY COURT - DIVORCE ( 15056 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Family Court Act Section 19

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Upendra Kumar Sharma @ Narendra Sharma

    Adv. Pankaj Kumar,RAM MURTI,RAM MURTI, Niranjan Kumar,RAM MURTI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Baby Devi Advocate - Arvind Kumar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri,Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar JhaView PDF

  3. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri,Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar JhaView PDF

    The High Court of Patna dismissed the miscellaneous appeal as not maintainable, finding that the appellant challenged a dismissal order in a matrimonial divorce case that was not appealable under law. The court held that since the underlying order dismissing Divorce Case No. 372 of 2022 for default under Order IX Rule 4 of the CPC was not appealable, the present appeal could not be sustained and was accordingly disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha

  5. 20-Apr-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha

  6. 17-Mar-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha

  7. 16-Mar-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha

  9. 12-Mar-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha

  10. 10-Mar-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Chandra Shekhar Jha

  11. 09-Mar-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  12. 27-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  13. 26-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  14. 25-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  15. 24-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  16. 23-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  17. 20-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  18. 19-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  19. 18-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  20. 17-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  21. 09-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra

  22. 06-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Sunil Dutta Mishra

  23. 05-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Ansul

  24. 04-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Ansul

  25. 03-Feb-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Ansul

  26. 28-Jan-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  27. 17-Jan-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  28. 16-Jan-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  29. 15-Jan-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  30. 13-Jan-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  31. 12-Jan-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  32. 09-Jan-2026

    For Hearing Under Order 41 Rule 11 CPC

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  33. 07-Jan-2026

    For Orders (On Petitions)

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  34. 24-Nov-2025

    For Orders (On Office Notes)

    Mr. Justice Bibek Chaudhuri , Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

  35. 14-Oct-2025

    To Be Mentioned

    Mr. Justice P. B. Bajanthri , Mr. Justice Alok Kumar Pandey

  36. 20-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  37. 18-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. MA/403/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Patna dismissed the miscellaneous appeal as not maintainable, finding that the appellant challenged a dismissal order in a matrimonial divorce case that was not appealable under law. The court held that since the underlying order dismissing Divorce Case No. 372 of 2022 for default under Order IX Rule 4 of the CPC was not appealable, the present appeal could not be sustained and was accordingly disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case