Bir Bahadur Singh vs The State of Bihar through Sri B. Rajender, name of father not known to the petitioner, — MJC/1843/2024

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010531172024

e-Filing Number

17-05-2024

Filing Number

MJC/12130/2024

Filing Date

18-May-2024

Registration No

MJC/1843/2024

Registration Date

23-May-2024

Judge

Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah

Coram

Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 21-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bir Bahadur Singh

    Adv. Ajay Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar through Sri B. Rajender, name of father not known to the petitioner,

  2. 2.Sri Pratyaya Amrit,

  3. 3.Sri Mukul Kumar Gupta,

  4. 4.Sri Amitesh Kumar,

  5. 5.Sri Sujit Kumar,

  6. 6.Sri Prabhat Kumar,

  7. 7.Sri Pankaj Thakur,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar ShahView PDF

    The Patna High Court disposed of the petition after the state's counsel confirmed that the District Magistrate, Siwan had already considered and rejected the petitioner's representation via Memo No. 1170 dated 6.8.2024, thereby complying with an earlier court order from 15.02.2024. The court granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the rejection order dated 6.8.2024 through any other available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Aug-2024

    Miscellaneous

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima

  4. 18-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/1843/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The Patna High Court disposed of the petition after the state's counsel confirmed that the District Magistrate, Siwan had already considered and rejected the petitioner's representation via Memo No. 1170 dated 6.8.2024, thereby complying with an earlier court order from 15.02.2024. The court granted the petitioner liberty to challenge the rejection order dated 6.8.2024 through any other available legal remedies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case