Ajit Kumar vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna Sri Anjani Kumar Singh — MJC/2784/2018
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010525432018
Filing Number
MJC/74162/2018
Filing Date
27-Jul-2018
Registration No
MJC/2784/2018
Registration Date
27-Jul-2018
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ajit Kumar
Adv. Vijay Shankar Shrivastava,PRITISH RANJAN,PRITISH RANJAN, PRITISH RANJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State Of Bihar, Through The Chief Secretary, Government Of Bihar, Patna Sri Anjani Kumar Singh
Adv. Raghwanand (GA
-
2.1123
-
3.SRI A.K.PRASAR, THE DISTRICT MAGISTRATE-CUM-CHAIRMAN
-
4.SRI BHUPENDAR PRASAD YADAV, THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR(ESTABLISHMENT)
-
5.SRI VIJAY KUMAR SINGH, THE BLOCK DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
The Patna High Court dismissed Ajit Kumar's contempt petition seeking action against state officials for alleged willful disobedience of a 2011 court order. The court noted that the District Magistrate, Gopalganj had rejected the petitioner's claim via order dated 14.01.2013, and disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the matter further if grievance remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Apr-2019
For Admission
Mr. Justice Vikash Jain
-
27-Jul-2018
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/2784/2018
The Patna High Court dismissed Ajit Kumar's contempt petition seeking action against state officials for alleged willful disobedience of a 2011 court order. The court noted that the District Magistrate, Gopalganj had rejected the petitioner's claim via order dated 14.01.2013, and disposed of the contempt petition while granting the petitioner liberty to pursue the matter further if grievance remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts