Vikas Kumar vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/8941/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Jun-2025

CNR: BRHC010494012025

e-Filing Number

12-05-2025

Filing Number

CWJC/12099/2025

Filing Date

12-May-2025

Registration No

CWJC/8941/2025

Registration Date

23-May-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

Coram

Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

SELECTION , NON GAZETTED SER. ( 2502 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vikas Kumar

    Adv. SURYA NILAMBARI,Akshansh Ankit,Akshansh Ankit, ,Akshansh Ankit

  2. 2.Sandeep Kumar

  3. 3.Dhanraj Kumar

  4. 4.Ravishankar Kumar

  5. 5.Rishi Kumar,

  6. 6.Amit Kumar

  7. 7.Satyendra Pal,

  8. 8.Chandan Bharti,

  9. 9.Raushan Kumar,

  10. 10.Amit Kumar,

  11. 11.Vikash Kumar

  12. 12.Raubinsh Kumar

  13. 13.Dinesh Kumar

  14. 14.Abhishek Kumar

  15. 15.Balram Kumar

  16. 16.Laloo Kumar

  17. 17.Amit Kumar

  18. 18.Avinash Kumar

  19. 19.Naveen Kumar Yadav

  20. 20.Shankar Kumar Nirala

  21. 21.Shankar Kumar

  22. 22.Alok Ranjan Karn

  23. 23.Vijay Kumar

  24. 24.Raj Abhishek

  25. 25.Ravi Kumar Shastri,

  26. 26.Sahindra Kumar

  27. 27.Amit Kumar

  28. 28.Mithun Kumar

  29. 29.Lakshmi Kumar

  30. 30.Rajeev Ranjan Kumar

  31. 31.Sumit Kumar

  32. 32.Niraj Kumar

  33. 33.Marshal Jahannavi

  34. 34.Gunjan Kumar

  35. 35.Ranvir Kumar

  36. 36.Mukesh Kumar

  37. 37.Jaysri Kumar

  38. 38.Babloo Kumar,

  39. 39.Santosh Kumar

  40. 40.Nitesh Kumar

  41. 41.Shrawan Kumar

  42. 42.Deepak Raj

  43. 43.Sudhanshu Kumar

  44. 44.Satya Prakash Singh

  45. 45.Dhananjay Kumar

  46. 46.Aman Kumar

  47. 47.Anil Kumar

  48. 48.Ranjeet Kumar

  49. 49.Nitish Kumar Jawahar

  50. 50.Subhash Kumar

  51. 51.Raja Kumar

  52. 52.Md. Asif Raza

  53. 53.Jay Prakash Kumar

  54. 54.Deepak Kumar

  55. 55.Rajan Kumar Pankaj

  56. 56.Pappu Kumar Sharma

  57. 57.Rabindra Kumar Mandal

  58. 58.Atul Anand

  59. 59.Pankaj Kumar

  60. 60.Prahlad Kumar

  61. 61.Ravi Kumar

  62. 62.Praveen Kumar

  63. 63.Vinay Kumar

  64. 64.Saurabh Kumar

  65. 65.Manmohan Kumar

  66. 66.Navod Kumar Yadav

  67. 67.Raju Kumar

  68. 68.Rishi Ranjan Verma

  69. 69.Abhishek Kumar

  70. 70.Rohit Kumar

  71. 71.Md. Ali Zafari

  72. 72.Shashi Kumar

  73. 73.Amartya Pratap Chaudhary

  74. 74.Shiv Shankar Kumar

  75. 75.Sanesh Kumar,

  76. 76.Vinay Kumar Thakur

  77. 77.Milton Kumar

  78. 78.Niraj Kumar

  79. 79.Shashikant Kumar

  80. 80.Bhagwan Prasad Kamat

  81. 81.Prashant Kumar

  82. 82.Sushant Kumar

  83. 83.Shubham Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

    Adv. ,Nikesh Kumar 1123

  2. 2.The Additional Chief Secretary,

  3. 3.The Principal Secretary,

  4. 4.The Principal Secretary,

  5. 5.The Secretary,

  6. 6.The Principal Secretary,

  7. 7.The Secretary

  8. 8.The Additional Secretary,

  9. 9.The Secretary,

  10. 10.The Bihar Technical Service Commission,

  11. 11.The Chairman,

  12. 12.The Secretary,

  13. 13.The Deputy Secretary,

  14. 14.Jyoti Kumari

  15. 15.Nayan Kumar Singh

  16. 16.Rajesh Saigal

  17. 17.Praveen Kumar

  18. 18.Nishant Kumar

  19. 19.Aryan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Dr. AnshumanView PDF

  3. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Dr. AnshumanView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/8941/2025 The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition by 83 candidates challenging their exclusion from a Junior Engineer recruitment (Advertisement No. 01/2019) conducted by the Bihar Technical Service Commission. The petitioners alleged they were wrongly overlooked while candidates who registered after the stipulated cut-off date were selected. However, the court found the issue identical to a previously decided case (CWJC 9448/2025) and upheld that petitioners raised objections belatedly after final selection results were announced. The court ruled that absent any explicit cut-off date for qualifications in the advertisement, the application submission deadline prevails for determining eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Jun-2025

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  5. 12-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/8941/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/8941/2025 The Patna High Court dismissed a writ petition by 83 candidates challenging their exclusion from a Junior Engineer recruitment (Advertisement No. 01/2019) conducted by the Bihar Technical Service Commission. The petitioners alleged they were wrongly overlooked while candidates who registered after the stipulated cut-off date were selected. However, the court found the issue identical to a previously decided case (CWJC 9448/2025) and upheld that petitioners raised objections belatedly after final selection results were announced. The court ruled that absent any explicit cut-off date for qualifications in the advertisement, the application submission deadline prevails for determining eligibility. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case