Vinod Kumar vs The State of Bihar — MJC/1269/2020

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,12. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010487892020

Filing Number

MJC/11249/2020

Filing Date

14-Oct-2020

Registration No

MJC/1269/2020

Registration Date

23-Dec-2020

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 10,12
Constitution of India Section 215

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vinod Kumar

    Adv. Rama Kant Singh

  2. 2.Ajay Kumar

  3. 3.Ashok Kumar

  4. 4.Bijay Ram

  5. 5.Birendra Ram

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.Shri Sanjay Kumar

  3. 3.Dr. Ranjit Kumar Singh, IAS,

  4. 4.Rina Kumari,

  5. 5.Shri Parsuram Singh,

  6. 6.Anil Kumar Yadav,

  7. 7.Krishna Yadav,

  8. 8.Devyanti Devi,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    The Patna High Court dismissed the contempt petition filed by Vinod Kumar, Ajay Kumar, and Ashok Kumar against State of Bihar officials for alleged willful disobedience of a prior writ court order. The court found that the writ court's order had been complied with and disposed of the contempt petition, while granting liberty to petitioners to raise any remaining grievances in future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Lokadalat ( For Orders )

    Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

  4. 28-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 14-Oct-2020

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/1269/2020

casestatus.in Summary

The Patna High Court dismissed the contempt petition filed by Vinod Kumar, Ajay Kumar, and Ashok Kumar against State of Bihar officials for alleged willful disobedience of a prior writ court order. The court found that the writ court's order had been complied with and disposed of the contempt petition, while granting liberty to petitioners to raise any remaining grievances in future proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case