Birendra Kumar Binay vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/9295/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-Jul-2022

CNR: BRHC010478942022

e-Filing Number

23-06-2022

Filing Number

CWJC/11166/2022

Filing Date

23-Jun-2022

Registration No

CWJC/9295/2022

Registration Date

01-Jul-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

PAY SCALES , SCHOOL SER. ( 4606 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Birendra Kumar Binay

    Adv. Pranav Kumar,Shrishti Singh,Shrishti Singh, ,Ashish Giri,Shrishti Singh

  2. 2.Rajendra Prasad,

  3. 3.Md. Abu Ejaz Asghar,

  4. 4.Srikant Tiwari,

  5. 5.Md. Nasar Ahmad,

  6. 6.Mohammad Iftekhar,

  7. 7.Ramchandra Prasad

  8. 8.Hemant Kumar,

  9. 9.Pankaj Kumar,

  10. 10.Kiran Kumari,

  11. 11.Nand Kumar Jha,

  12. 12.Pradeep Kumar,

  13. 13.Prakash Prasad Yadav,

  14. 14.Binoy Kumar Varma,

  15. 15.Umesh Kumar,

  16. 16.Ram Bahadur Yadav,

  17. 17.Vijay Kumar,

  18. 18.Ganesh Prasad Yadav,

  19. 19.Ravindra Kumar,

  20. 20.Brij Kishor Prasad,

  21. 21.Kiran Kumari,

  22. 22.Kamakhya Naran Singh,

  23. 23.Bansidhar Ram,

  24. 24.Md. Naiyer Alam,

  25. 25.Shashi Kiran Kumari,

  26. 26.Vinay Kumar,

  27. 27.Raj Deo Pal,

  28. 28.Ram Jee Singh,

  29. 29.Pankaj Kumar,

  30. 30.Suresh Paswan

  31. 31.Rama Nath Jha,

  32. 32.Md. Siddique Ansari,

  33. 33.Jameel Ahmad,

  34. 34.Vimal Kumar,

  35. 35.Rajkishore Kumar,

  36. 36.Jagtendra Prasad Singh,

  37. 37.Mahendra Kapoor Gupta,

  38. 38.Shailesh Kumar

  39. 39.Asghar Kamal,

  40. 40.Arvind Kumar,

  41. 41.Rajeev Ranjan,

  42. 42.Md. Aslam Nazri,

  43. 43.Md. Faiyaz Alam,

  44. 44.Subodh Kumar,

  45. 45.Anil Kumar Yadav,

  46. 46.Sudhir Prasad,

  47. 47.Bipin Kumar,

  48. 48.Mukesh Kumar Bhagat,

  49. 49.Vijay Kumar Singh,

  50. 50.Jagnarayan Ram,

  51. 51.S.M. Badre Samri,

  52. 52.Ashok Kumar,

  53. 53.Manoj Kumar Singh,

  54. 54.Nimal Kumar,

  55. 55.Uday Narayan Singh,

  56. 56.Indu Kumari,

  57. 57.Arvind Kumar Singh,

  58. 58.Baijnath Prasad Singh,

  59. 59.Gautam Kumar,

  60. 60.Lalan Thakur,

  61. 61.Rangnath Sinha,

  62. 62.Anand Mohan,

  63. 63.Ajay Kumar Paswan,

  64. 64.Vinod Kumar,

  65. 65.Devendra Kumar Vishwakarma,

  66. 66.Kanchan Kumar Kunj,

  67. 67.Arun Kumar,

  68. 68.Rajeev Kumar Ranjan,

  69. 69.Rajesh Kumar,

  70. 70.Suryadev Narain,

  71. 71.Yugeshwar Ram,

  72. 72.Md. Mamoor Reza,

  73. 73.Neelam Kumari,

  74. 74.Manoj Kumar Das,

  75. 75.Surendra Kumar Paswan,

  76. 76.Pankaj Kumar Ray,

  77. 77.Bindeshwar Prasad Singh,

  78. 78.Ajit Kumar Ranjan,

  79. 79.Gopal Choudhary,

  80. 80.Naeem Akhtar,

  81. 81.Bhupendra Prasad Yadav,

  82. 82.Baidya Nath Yadav,

  83. 83.Sant Gyan Swarup Sahab,

  84. 84.Khagesh Jha,

  85. 85.Krishan Mohan Yadav,

  86. 86.Radhe Shyam Sharma,

  87. 87.Krishna Paswan,

  88. 88.Baboo Ram Das,

  89. 89.Ram Deo Ram,

  90. 90.Ram Lochan Prasad Yadav,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

    Adv. ,Prabhat Ranjan 1123

  2. 2.The Secretary, SC and ST Welfare Department,

  3. 3.The Joint Secretary, SC and ST Welfare Department,

  4. 4.The Director, SC and ST Welfare Department,

  5. 5.The Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department,

  6. 6.The District Welfare Officer,

  7. 7.The District Welfare Officer,

  8. 8.The District Welfare Officer,

  9. 9.The District Welfare Officer,

  10. 10.The District Welfare Officer,

  11. 11.The District Welfare Officer,

  12. 12.The District Welfare Officer,

  13. 13.The District Welfare Officer,

  14. 14.The District Welfare Officer,

  15. 15.The District Welfare Officer,

  16. 16.The District Welfare Officer,

  17. 17.The District Welfare Officer,

  18. 18.The District Welfare Officer,

  19. 19.The District Welfare Officer,

  20. 20.The District Welfare Officer,

  21. 21.The District Welfare Officer,

  22. 22.The District Welfare Officer,

  23. 23.The District Welfare Officer,

  24. 24.The District Welfare Officer,

  25. 25.The District Welfare Officer,

  26. 26.The District Welfare Officer,

  27. 27.The District Welfare Officer,

  28. 28.The District Welfare Officer,

  29. 29.The District Welfare Officer,

  30. 30.The District Welfare Officer,

  31. 31.The District Welfare Officer,

  32. 32.Principal Accountant General (A and E),

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Ritesh KumarView PDF

  3. 07-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Ritesh KumarView PDF

  4. 07-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Ritesh KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC No. 9295/2022 The Patna High Court quashed two orders (Memos 1856/2022 and 1727/2023) issued by Bihar's SC/ST Welfare Department that withdrew pay benefits from 90 petitioners, finding they violated natural justice by being issued without show-cause notices or hearing opportunities. The court remitted the matter for fresh decision-making with proper procedural safeguards and stayed all recovery actions pending the redecision within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 01-May-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

  6. 24-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

  7. 22-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

  8. 10-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

  9. 03-Apr-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

  10. 30-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

  11. 19-Mar-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

  12. 09-Mar-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  13. 20-Feb-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  14. 19-Feb-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  15. 17-Feb-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  16. 16-Feb-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  17. 13-Feb-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  18. 11-Feb-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  19. 10-Feb-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  20. 04-Feb-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  21. 03-Feb-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  22. 02-Feb-2026

    For Admission II

    Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Sinha

  23. 17-Dec-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy

  24. 17-Nov-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Nani Tagia

  25. 26-Sep-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Nani Tagia

  26. 20-Aug-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Nani Tagia

  27. 01-Aug-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Nani Tagia

  28. 07-Jul-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Nani Tagia

  29. 04-Jul-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Nani Tagia

  30. 23-Jun-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Nani Tagia

  31. 22-Apr-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Nani Tagia

  32. 22-Apr-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Nani Tagia

  33. 24-Mar-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Nani Tagia

  34. 22-Mar-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Nani Tagia

  35. 21-Mar-2025

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Nani Tagia

  36. 19-Aug-2024

    For Orders (On Office Notes)

    Mr. Justice Nani Tagia

  37. 22-Sep-2022

    To Be Mentioned

    Mr. Justice Sanjeev Prakash Sharma

  38. 04-Jul-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 23-Jun-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/9295/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC No. 9295/2022 The Patna High Court quashed two orders (Memos 1856/2022 and 1727/2023) issued by Bihar's SC/ST Welfare Department that withdrew pay benefits from 90 petitioners, finding they violated natural justice by being issued without show-cause notices or hearing opportunities. The court remitted the matter for fresh decision-making with proper procedural safeguards and stayed all recovery actions pending the redecision within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case