The State of Bihar Sriram Krishna(AC To SC vs Anil Kumar — MJC/1468/2023
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 19th June 2026.
CNR: BRHC010463092023
e-Filing Number
16-05-2023
Filing Number
MJC/10902/2023
Filing Date
17-May-2023
Registration No
MJC/1468/2023
Registration Date
17-May-2023
Judge
Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma , Mr. Justice Harish Kumar
Coram
Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma , Mr. Justice Harish Kumar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
RESTORATION- DB ( 15031 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar Sriram Krishna(AC To SC
-
2.The Additional Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
-
3.The Assitant Commissioner of Commercial Taxes,
Respondent(s)
-
1.Anil Kumar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma,Mr. Justice Harish KumarView PDF
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma,Mr. Justice Harish KumarView PDF
The Patna High Court allowed the State of Bihar's application for condonation of a seven-day delay in filing a restoration application for Letters Patent Appeal No. 703 of 2021, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution on 10.04.2023. The court restored the appeal to its original file and granted permission to the State to rectify procedural defects identified by the court office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
For Orders
Mr. Justice Satyavrat Verma , Mr. Justice Harish Kumar
-
07-Nov-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
17-May-2023
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/1468/2023
The Patna High Court allowed the State of Bihar's application for condonation of a seven-day delay in filing a restoration application for Letters Patent Appeal No. 703 of 2021, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution on 10.04.2023. The court restored the appeal to its original file and granted permission to the State to rectify procedural defects identified by the court office. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts