Dr. Arun Kumar Chaudhary vs The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Human Resources, Development, Govt. Of Bihar, Advocate - Alka Verma, ,Ajay Behari Sinha,Binita Singh (SC — MJC/2530/2017
Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010460262017
Filing Number
MJC/68731/2017
Filing Date
29-Aug-2017
Registration No
MJC/2530/2017
Registration Date
29-Aug-2017
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dr. Arun Kumar Chaudhary
Adv. Ratan Kumar Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State Of Bihar, Through The Principal Secretary, Human Resources, Development, Govt. Of Bihar, Advocate - Alka Verma, ,Ajay Behari Sinha,Binita Singh (SC
-
2.The Vice Chancellor, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga, Government of Bihar, Patna.
Adv. Ajay Behari Sinha Binita Singh (SC
-
3.The Registrar, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga.
Adv. Ajay Behari Sinha Binita Singh (SC
-
4.The Finance Officer, L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga.
Adv. Ajay Behari Sinha Binita Singh (SC
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
The Patna High Court disposed of Dr. Arun Kumar Chaudhary's contempt petition against L.N. Mithila University for alleged disobedience of a 2010 court order, after the University demonstrated through Annexure-A that payments had been made. The court granted the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter if any grievance remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Dec-2019
Lokadalat ( For Orders )
Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah
-
29-Aug-2017
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/2530/2017
The Patna High Court disposed of Dr. Arun Kumar Chaudhary's contempt petition against L.N. Mithila University for alleged disobedience of a 2010 court order, after the University demonstrated through Annexure-A that payments had been made. The court granted the petitioner liberty to agitate the matter if any grievance remained. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts