Dharmendra Kumar vs The State of Bihar — MJC/1553/2024
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 19th June 2026.
CNR: BRHC010450662024
e-Filing Number
30-04-2024
Filing Number
MJC/10280/2024
Filing Date
01-May-2024
Registration No
MJC/1553/2024
Registration Date
02-May-2024
Judge
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Coram
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
RESTORATION-SJ ( 200 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Dharmendra Kumar
Adv. Ashutosh Nath,ARVIND KUMAR,ARVIND KUMAR, ,AMRITANSHU DANGI,ARVIND KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.The Commissioner, Magadh Division,
-
3.The district Magistrate, Gaya,
-
4.The B.D.O Nim Chak Bathani,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar ShahView PDF
The Patna High Court allowed Dharmendra Kumar's restoration petition on 19-06-2026, restoring Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17886 of 2021 to its original file. The case had been dismissed for non-prosecution on 28-02-2024 after remaining pending for four years without hearing, as the petitioner's counsel's name could not be updated in court records. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah deemed restoration appropriate given the circumstances and accepted the petitioner's submission for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-May-2026
For Orders-II Tied Up
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
01-May-2026
For Orders-II Tied Up
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
24-Apr-2026
For Orders-II Tied Up
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
17-Apr-2026
For Orders-II Tied Up
Mr. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah
-
24-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/1553/2024
The Patna High Court allowed Dharmendra Kumar's restoration petition on 19-06-2026, restoring Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No. 17886 of 2021 to its original file. The case had been dismissed for non-prosecution on 28-02-2024 after remaining pending for four years without hearing, as the petitioner's counsel's name could not be updated in court records. Justice Mohit Kumar Shah deemed restoration appropriate given the circumstances and accepted the petitioner's submission for leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts