Saroj Devi vs The State of Bihar — MJC/1796/2019

Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: BRHC010449842019

Filing Number

MJC/16343/2019

Filing Date

25-Apr-2019

Registration No

MJC/1796/2019

Registration Date

25-Apr-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MJC ( 10 )

Sub-Category

CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 215
Contempt of Courts Act Section 11,12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Saroj Devi

    Adv. Vasant Vikas,Pramod Kumar Singh,Pramod Kumar Singh, ,Pramod Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.Mr. Arvind Kumar Chaudhary

  3. 3.Mr. S. Siddharth

  4. 4.Mr. Shirsat Kapil Ashok

  5. 5.Mr. D.N. Jha

  6. 6.Mr. Chandrashekhar Singh

  7. 7.Mr. Binay Kumar Rai

  8. 8.Mr. Ajay Kumar

  9. 9.Mr. Barun Kumar Mishra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Saroj Devi filed a contempt petition seeking action against Bihar state officials for willfully disobeying a March 19, 2018 order from an earlier civil writ case. The Patna High Court disposed of the contempt petition by granting Saroj Devi liberty to agitate the matter further if her grievance regarding the negated claim persists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    Lokadalat ( For Orders )

    Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

  4. 25-Apr-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. MJC/1796/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Saroj Devi filed a contempt petition seeking action against Bihar state officials for willfully disobeying a March 19, 2018 order from an earlier civil writ case. The Patna High Court disposed of the contempt petition by granting Saroj Devi liberty to agitate the matter further if her grievance regarding the negated claim persists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case