RamNath Mishra vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/8594/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Jun-2025

CNR: BRHC010447852025

e-Filing Number

30-04-2025

Filing Number

CWJC/11032/2025

Filing Date

30-Apr-2025

Registration No

CWJC/8594/2025

Registration Date

20-May-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 6700 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RamNath Mishra

    Adv. Awadhesh Kumar Pandey,Arvind Kumar,Arvind Kumar, ,Arvind Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The District Magistrate,

  3. 3.The D.C.L.R. Jagdishpur,

  4. 4.The Circle Officer,

  5. 5.Sanjay Mishra Alias Sheo Prasad Mishra,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/8594/2025 RamNath Mishra challenged notices issued by the Circle Officer regarding alleged land encroachment on his property in Village Dawan, Bhojpur district. The petitioner sought to set aside notices dated 12.11.2024 and 25.11.2024, contending the land was not properly demarcated and did not fall under the Land Encroachment Act. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate authority or court for redressal of his grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2025

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 30-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/8594/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/8594/2025 RamNath Mishra challenged notices issued by the Circle Officer regarding alleged land encroachment on his property in Village Dawan, Bhojpur district. The petitioner sought to set aside notices dated 12.11.2024 and 25.11.2024, contending the land was not properly demarcated and did not fall under the Land Encroachment Act. Justice Rajiv Roy disposed of the petition, granting the petitioner liberty to approach the appropriate authority or court for redressal of his grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case