Suresh Prasad Sahu vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/7858/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-May-2025

CNR: BRHC010447352025

e-Filing Number

30-04-2025

Filing Number

CWJC/11006/2025

Filing Date

30-Apr-2025

Registration No

CWJC/7858/2025

Registration Date

09-May-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 6700 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Prasad Sahu

    Adv. Ratneshwar Prasad,Nitu Kumari,Nitu Kumari, ,Yogendra Kumar Singh,Nitu Kumari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The District Magistrate Muzaffarpur,

  3. 3.The Additional District Collector,

  4. 4.The Sub-Registrar Muzaffarpur,

  5. 5.The Land Reform District Collector West,

  6. 6.The Circle Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    SUMMARY Suresh Prasad Sahu filed a writ petition seeking a Mandamus to remove his land (Khata No. 152, Kheshra No. 421) in Village Abhuchak, Muzaffarpur from a stay list prepared by the Sub-Registrar. The Patna High Court heard both parties on May 5, 2026; however, the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, and the court accordingly dismissed it as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-May-2025

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 30-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/7858/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY Suresh Prasad Sahu filed a writ petition seeking a Mandamus to remove his land (Khata No. 152, Kheshra No. 421) in Village Abhuchak, Muzaffarpur from a stay list prepared by the Sub-Registrar. The Patna High Court heard both parties on May 5, 2026; however, the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal of the petition, and the court accordingly dismissed it as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case