Gudiya Devi vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/8738/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Jun-2025

CNR: BRHC010444042025

e-Filing Number

30-04-2025

Filing Number

CWJC/10914/2025

Filing Date

30-Apr-2025

Registration No

CWJC/8738/2025

Registration Date

21-May-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

MUTATION ACT ( 6200 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gudiya Devi

    Adv. Surendra Pd. Singh,Dhananjay Mishra,Dhananjay Mishra, ,Dhananjay Mishra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The Collector (D.M.)

  3. 3.The Deputy Collector,

  4. 4.The Circle Officer,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    The Patna High Court disposed of Gudiya Devi's writ petition seeking name mutation and Jamabandi registration in land records by directing her to approach the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Aurangabad, for resolution. The court allowed the petitioner to pursue her relief through the administrative channel rather than adjudicating the matter directly, with the Deputy Collector instructed to hear the parties and resolve the issue expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2025

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 30-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/8738/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Patna High Court disposed of Gudiya Devi's writ petition seeking name mutation and Jamabandi registration in land records by directing her to approach the Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Aurangabad, for resolution. The court allowed the petitioner to pursue her relief through the administrative channel rather than adjudicating the matter directly, with the Deputy Collector instructed to hear the parties and resolve the issue expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case