Vivek Kumar vs The Honble High Court of Judicature Advocate - ANUKRITI JAIPURIYAR — CWJC/8874/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Jun-2025

CNR: BRHC010424922025

e-Filing Number

23-04-2025

Filing Number

CWJC/10447/2025

Filing Date

24-Apr-2025

Registration No

CWJC/8874/2025

Registration Date

22-May-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

Coram

Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

SELECTION , NON GAZETTED SER. ( 2502 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vivek Kumar

    Adv. Namrata Dubey,HEMANT RAJ,HEMANT RAJ, Kumar Kaushik,SANJEEV KUMAR,HEMANT RAJ

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Honble High Court of Judicature Advocate - ANUKRITI JAIPURIYAR

  2. 2.The Learned Registrar General, Hon'ble High Court of Judicature

  3. 3.The Centralized Selection and Appointment Committee

  4. 4.The Learned Convenor,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Dr. AnshumanView PDF

    Case Summary: Petitioner Vivek Kumar filed a writ petition challenging proceedings related to a Centralized Selection and Appointment Committee. On 04-05-2026, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous following publication of the waiting list results and sought withdrawal. Justice Dr. Anshuman granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jun-2025

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 24-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/8874/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Petitioner Vivek Kumar filed a writ petition challenging proceedings related to a Centralized Selection and Appointment Committee. On 04-05-2026, the petitioner's counsel submitted that the petition had become infructuous following publication of the waiting list results and sought withdrawal. Justice Dr. Anshuman granted permission and dismissed the petition as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case