Rajnish Kumar vs The Union of India Advocate - Additional Solicitor General, ,Manoj Kumar Singh,Government Advocate ( — CWJC/6946/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-May-2026

CNR: BRHC010423672026

e-Filing Number

22-04-2026

Filing Number

CWJC/9399/2026

Filing Date

22-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWJC/6946/2026

Registration Date

01-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

Coram

Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

REM/DIS/TER, OTHERS ( 5110 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rajnish Kumar

    Adv. Pravin Kumar,Manish Kumar Singh,Manish Kumar Singh, ,Manish Kumar Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The Union of India Advocate - Additional Solicitor General, ,Manoj Kumar Singh,Government Advocate (

  2. 2.Director General,

  3. 3.Inspector General,

  4. 4.Deputy Inspector General,

  5. 5.Commandant,

  6. 6.Superintendent of Police,

  7. 7.S.H.O.,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Dr. AnshumanView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/6946/2026 Rajnish Kumar v. Union of India & Others Rajnish Kumar, a BSF employee, challenged his dismissal order dated 12.12.2025 by the 87 Battalion BSF Commandant, seeking quashing of the dismissal and reinstatement with back wages. The Patna High Court found that Kumar's statutory appeal remained pending before the appellate authority (Inspector General, Frontier HQ BSF, North Bengal) despite reminders. Rather than adjudicating the substantive writ petition, Justice Dr. Anshuman directed the appellate authority to decide Kumar's statutory appeal within 90 days by passing a reasoned order, thereby disposing of the writ petition to allow the internal appellate mechanism to function. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 22-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/6946/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/6946/2026 Rajnish Kumar v. Union of India & Others Rajnish Kumar, a BSF employee, challenged his dismissal order dated 12.12.2025 by the 87 Battalion BSF Commandant, seeking quashing of the dismissal and reinstatement with back wages. The Patna High Court found that Kumar's statutory appeal remained pending before the appellate authority (Inspector General, Frontier HQ BSF, North Bengal) despite reminders. Rather than adjudicating the substantive writ petition, Justice Dr. Anshuman directed the appellate authority to decide Kumar's statutory appeal within 90 days by passing a reasoned order, thereby disposing of the writ petition to allow the internal appellate mechanism to function. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case