Vandan vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/6994/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-May-2026

CNR: BRHC010418282026

e-Filing Number

21-04-2026

Filing Number

CWJC/9261/2026

Filing Date

21-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWJC/6994/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

Coram

Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

SALARY, HEALTH SER. ( 4305 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vandan

    Adv. Gajendra Kumar Singh,Amrendra Narayan Rai,Amrendra Narayan Rai, ,Amrendra Narayan Rai

  2. 2.Dilip Kumar

  3. 3.Sushil Kumar

  4. 4.Sudhir Kumar

  5. 5.Deepak Kumar @ Dipak Paswan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

    Adv. ,Kishore Kumar Sinha 1123

  2. 2.The Director in Chief,

  3. 3.The Executive Director,

  4. 4.The District Magistrate,

  5. 5.The Secretary,

  6. 6.The Civil Surgen,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Dr. AnshumanView PDF

    The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by five petitioners seeking unpaid salary arrears from November 2023 onwards. Rather than granting direct relief, the court directed the petitioners to file a fresh representation before the District Magistrate, Samastipur within 30 days, who must then issue a reasoned order within 90 days, effectively deferring the matter to administrative review instead of judicial determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/6994/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition filed by five petitioners seeking unpaid salary arrears from November 2023 onwards. Rather than granting direct relief, the court directed the petitioners to file a fresh representation before the District Magistrate, Samastipur within 30 days, who must then issue a reasoned order within 90 days, effectively deferring the matter to administrative review instead of judicial determination. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case