Atul Kumar Mishra vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/6796/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010417262026
e-Filing Number
21-04-2026
Filing Number
CWJC/9244/2026
Filing Date
21-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWJC/6796/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
Coram
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS, NON GAZETTED SER. ( 5402 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Atul Kumar Mishra
Adv. Pramod Rajpati,DURGA KUMARI,DURGA KUMARI, ,DURGA KUMARI
-
2.Nand Kishor Jha
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
Adv. ,Prashant Sinha 1123
-
2.The Additional Chief Secretary,
-
3.The Additional Chief Secretary, Finance Department,
-
4.The Principal Secretary,
-
5.The Chief Executive Officer,
-
6.The Employees Provident Fund Organisation (EPFO),
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Mr. Justice Dr. AnshumanView PDF
The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing petitioners Atul Kumar Mishra and Nand Kishor Jha to file a fresh representation before the Chief Executive Officer of Bihar Rural Development Society (BRDS) within 30 days, challenging their alleged unlawful EPF deductions over eight years. The CEO was directed to decide the representation within 90 days with reasoned and detailed order, rather than the court adjudicating the substantive claim of illegal deductions without proper authority of law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
01-May-2026
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
21-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/6796/2026
The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing petitioners Atul Kumar Mishra and Nand Kishor Jha to file a fresh representation before the Chief Executive Officer of Bihar Rural Development Society (BRDS) within 30 days, challenging their alleged unlawful EPF deductions over eight years. The CEO was directed to decide the representation within 90 days with reasoned and detailed order, rather than the court adjudicating the substantive claim of illegal deductions without proper authority of law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts