Manoj Pandey vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/11784/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 23-Jul-2025

CNR: BRHC010415102025

e-Filing Number

22-04-2025

Filing Number

CWJC/10171/2025

Filing Date

22-Apr-2025

Registration No

CWJC/11784/2025

Registration Date

22-Jul-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

ARMS ACT ( 11500 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Manoj Pandey

    Adv. Raju Kumar Singh,Kumari Seema Singh,Kumari Seema Singh, ,Abhoy Kumar Kashyap,Anju Kumari Sinha,Kumari Seema Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The District Magistrate,

  3. 3.The S.P.,

  4. 4.The S.D.O., Jagdishpur,

  5. 5.The S.H.O., Sahar,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Ajit KumarView PDF

    Summary of CWJC/11784/2025 The Patna High Court dismissed Manoj Pandey's writ petition as withdrawn on 06-05-2026, after his counsel submitted that the petitioner's grievances had been redressed during the pendency of the case, rendering it infructuous. Justice Ajit Kumar granted the dismissal while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the resolution before any appropriate authority if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Jul-2025

    For Orders (On Office Notes)

    The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima Defective Cases Cause List

  4. 19-Jun-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/11784/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWJC/11784/2025 The Patna High Court dismissed Manoj Pandey's writ petition as withdrawn on 06-05-2026, after his counsel submitted that the petitioner's grievances had been redressed during the pendency of the case, rendering it infructuous. Justice Ajit Kumar granted the dismissal while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge the resolution before any appropriate authority if aggrieved. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case