Om Prakash Rajak vs The State of Bihar — MJC/1256/2023
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010402852023
e-Filing Number
28-04-2023
Filing Number
MJC/9454/2023
Filing Date
28-Apr-2023
Registration No
MJC/1256/2023
Registration Date
29-Apr-2023
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Om Prakash Rajak
Adv. Mirityunjay Kumar,SHILPA KUMARI,SHILPA KUMARI, ,SHILPA KUMARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.Yogendra Singh, The District Magistrate,
-
3.Rohit Roshan, The District Programme Officer,
-
4.Krishnadev Mahto, The Block Education Officer,
-
5.Raj Kumar, The Headmaster,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: Om Prakash Rajak filed a contempt petition seeking initiation of proceedings against state officials for willful disobedience of a July 9, 2019 court order from an earlier civil writ case. The High Court of Patna disposed of the contempt petition on May 5, 2026, granting the petitioner liberty to agitate any remaining grievances in appropriate proceedings, thereby declining to initiate formal contempt proceedings against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Aug-2023
Miscellaneous
The Joint Registrar Judicial Lawazima
-
28-Apr-2023
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/1256/2023
Case Summary: Om Prakash Rajak filed a contempt petition seeking initiation of proceedings against state officials for willful disobedience of a July 9, 2019 court order from an earlier civil writ case. The High Court of Patna disposed of the contempt petition on May 5, 2026, granting the petitioner liberty to agitate any remaining grievances in appropriate proceedings, thereby declining to initiate formal contempt proceedings against the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts