Premshila Devi vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/6783/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-May-2026

CNR: BRHC010399762026

e-Filing Number

16-04-2026

Filing Number

CWJC/8826/2026

Filing Date

17-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWJC/6783/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy

Coram

Mr. Justice A. Abhishek Reddy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

TRADE & COMMERCE (OTHERS) ( 7900 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Premshila Devi

    Adv. VARUN KRISHNA SINGH,Rajeev Kumar,Rajeev Kumar, ,Rajeev Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

    Adv. ,Sanjay Singh Thakur 1123

  2. 2.Bank of India, through its authorized officer,

  3. 3.The Authorized Officer - cum - Chief Manager, Bank of India,

  4. 4.M/S Krishna Furniture Udyog,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice A. Abhishek ReddyView PDF

    The Patna High Court dismissed Premshila Devi's writ petition at the admission stage, holding that she had an alternative and efficacious remedy available under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act by approaching the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Patna. The court disposed of the petition with consent of both parties and granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue her claim before the DRT if advised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/6783/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Patna High Court dismissed Premshila Devi's writ petition at the admission stage, holding that she had an alternative and efficacious remedy available under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act by approaching the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT), Patna. The court disposed of the petition with consent of both parties and granted liberty to the petitioner to pursue her claim before the DRT if advised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case