Lalbabu Prasad @ Lal Babu Prasad vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/7837/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010398722025
e-Filing Number
17-04-2025
Filing Number
CWJC/9749/2025
Filing Date
18-Apr-2025
Registration No
CWJC/7837/2025
Registration Date
08-May-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION ( 5900 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Lalbabu Prasad @ Lal Babu Prasad
Adv. Sanjay Kumar Singh
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
Adv. ,Saket Tiwary,Maurya Vijay Chandra 1123
-
2.The Additional Chief Secretary,
-
3.The District Magistrate-cum-Collector,
-
4.The District Land Acquisition Officer,
-
5.The Block Development Officer,
-
6.The Circle Officer,
-
7.The National Highways Authority of India,
-
8.The Project Director,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: CWJC/7837/2025 Lalbabu Prasad challenged the rejection of his arbitration appeals seeking enhanced land compensation for property acquired for the Ram-Janki Path highway project in Siwan district. He contended his land should be valued at Rs. 1,85,000 per decimal (2013 circle rate) plus Rs. 30,000 commercial benefit, arguing the land was commercial in nature situated on a main road, rather than agricultural "Dhanahar" land as originally assessed. The High Court disposed of the petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent Civil Court for redressal of his grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-May-2025
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
18-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/7837/2025
Case Summary: CWJC/7837/2025 Lalbabu Prasad challenged the rejection of his arbitration appeals seeking enhanced land compensation for property acquired for the Ram-Janki Path highway project in Siwan district. He contended his land should be valued at Rs. 1,85,000 per decimal (2013 circle rate) plus Rs. 30,000 commercial benefit, arguing the land was commercial in nature situated on a main road, rather than agricultural "Dhanahar" land as originally assessed. The High Court disposed of the petition, granting liberty to the petitioner to approach the competent Civil Court for redressal of his grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts