Raj Kumar Ram vs The State of Bihar, — MJC/1583/2019
Case under Constitution of India Section 215. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 07th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010398432019
Filing Number
MJC/14857/2019
Filing Date
11-Apr-2019
Registration No
MJC/1583/2019
Registration Date
11-Apr-2019
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MJC ( 10 )
Sub-Category
CONTEMPT- SJ ( 100 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Raj Kumar Ram
Adv. Ashutosh Kumar Jha
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar,
Adv. ,Purushottam Jha,Vikash Kumar Jha,Nilendu Kumar Choudhary 1123
-
2.The Ashutosh Ranjan Choudhary
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
The Patna High Court disposed of Raj Kumar Ram's contempt petition against the State of Bihar and Nagar Parishad Madhubani for alleged non-compliance with a July 2018 order. The court found that the Municipal Corporation had cleared all outstanding dues and arrears owed to the petitioner, thereby satisfying the previous order. The petition was disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the court again if any grievance persists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
02-Nov-2022
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah
-
19-Oct-2022
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah
-
29-Sep-2022
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah
-
28-Sep-2022
For Admission - Tied Up
Mr. Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah
-
14-Sep-2022
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Apr-2019
Case filed
Registration No. MJC/1583/2019
The Patna High Court disposed of Raj Kumar Ram's contempt petition against the State of Bihar and Nagar Parishad Madhubani for alleged non-compliance with a July 2018 order. The court found that the Municipal Corporation had cleared all outstanding dues and arrears owed to the petitioner, thereby satisfying the previous order. The petition was disposed of with liberty granted to the petitioner to approach the court again if any grievance persists. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts