Shahid Siddique vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/6759/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--WITHDRAWN on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Apr-2026

CNR: BRHC010383022026

e-Filing Number

10-04-2026

Filing Number

CWJC/8455/2026

Filing Date

10-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWJC/6759/2026

Registration Date

29-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

REM/DIS/TER, NON GAZETTED SER. ( 5102 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Shahid Siddique

    Adv. Sanjeev Kumar,SITESH KASHYAP,SITESH KASHYAP, ,SITESH KASHYAP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The Chief Secretary, Govt. of Bihar,

  3. 3.The Principal Secretary, Department of Animal Resources,

  4. 4.The Deputy Secretary, Department of Animal Resources,

  5. 5.The Director, Department of Animal Resources,

  6. 6.The Regional Director, Animal Resources,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Ritesh KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/6759/2026 On 04-05-2026, the Patna High Court heard the writ petition filed by Shahid Siddique against the State of Bihar and various officials from the Department of Animal Resources. After hearing arguments from both parties, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, which was granted by Justice Ritesh Kumar. The writ petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 10-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/6759/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/6759/2026 On 04-05-2026, the Patna High Court heard the writ petition filed by Shahid Siddique against the State of Bihar and various officials from the Department of Animal Resources. After hearing arguments from both parties, the petitioner's counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, which was granted by Justice Ritesh Kumar. The writ petition was accordingly dismissed as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case