Chandan Kumar Tiwary @ Chandan Kumar Tiwari vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/5989/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010377752026
e-Filing Number
08-04-2026
Filing Number
CWJC/8333/2026
Filing Date
09-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWJC/5989/2026
Registration Date
18-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar
Coram
Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
ARMS ACT ( 11500 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Chandan Kumar Tiwary @ Chandan Kumar Tiwari
Adv. Apurva Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
Adv. ,Kumar Manish 1123
-
2.The Home Secretary,
-
3.The District Magistrate,
-
4.The Commissioner,
-
5.The Additional District Magistrate (Arms),
-
6.The District Arms Magistrate,
-
7.The Senior Superintendent of Police,
-
8.The Sub Divisional Police Officer, Sadar,
-
9.The Station Head Officer, Jakanpur Police Station,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Mr. Justice Ajit KumarView PDF
Summary: The Patna High Court disposed of Chandan Kumar Tiwary's writ petition seeking an arms license for a handgun by directing the District Magistrate, Patna, to adjudicate his application (filed on 31.11.2021) and pass a final decision within eight weeks, with communication to the petitioner within the same period. The court found that the application was filed in prescribed format but remained pending without action, and the State's counsel acknowledged the competent authority's obligation to decide the matter according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
20-Apr-2026
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
09-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/5989/2026
Summary: The Patna High Court disposed of Chandan Kumar Tiwary's writ petition seeking an arms license for a handgun by directing the District Magistrate, Patna, to adjudicate his application (filed on 31.11.2021) and pass a final decision within eight weeks, with communication to the petitioner within the same period. The court found that the application was filed in prescribed format but remained pending without action, and the State's counsel acknowledged the competent authority's obligation to decide the matter according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts