Gopal Jee Prasad vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/7738/2025

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-May-2025

CNR: BRHC010365862025

e-Filing Number

09-04-2025

Filing Number

CWJC/8914/2025

Filing Date

09-Apr-2025

Registration No

CWJC/7738/2025

Registration Date

07-May-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

BIHAR TENENCY ACT ( 5700 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gopal Jee Prasad

    Adv. Saroj Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The District Magistrate,

  3. 3.The Circle Officer, Goh,

  4. 4.The Deputy Collector Land Reforms,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/7738/2025 The Patna High Court disposed of Gopal Jee Prasad's writ petition seeking correction of online rent receipts for multiple land plots and action against the responsible person. The court directed the petitioner to file a proper petition before the Circle Officer, Goh, Aurangabad, where it would be entertained and an appropriate order passed in accordance with law, rather than adjudicating the matter through the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2025

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 09-Apr-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/7738/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/7738/2025 The Patna High Court disposed of Gopal Jee Prasad's writ petition seeking correction of online rent receipts for multiple land plots and action against the responsible person. The court directed the petitioner to file a proper petition before the Circle Officer, Goh, Aurangabad, where it would be entertained and an appropriate order passed in accordance with law, rather than adjudicating the matter through the writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case