Poonam Dwivedi @ Punam Devi vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/5852/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Apr-2026

CNR: BRHC010361372026

e-Filing Number

03-04-2026

Filing Number

CWJC/7937/2026

Filing Date

06-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWJC/5852/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

Coram

Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 6700 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Poonam Dwivedi @ Punam Devi

    Adv. Prerna Anand

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The D.C.L.R. Bagaha,

  3. 3.Rajat Tulashyan,

  4. 4.Anupam Verma,

  5. 5.Sanjay Kumar,

  6. 6.Binod Sah,

  7. 7.Rani Devi,

  8. 8.Kanti Devi,

  9. 9.Dilip Ram,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Khatim RezaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/5852/2026 The Patna High Court dismissed Poonam Dwivedi's writ petition challenging a Land Reforms Deputy Collector's order dated 09.02.2026 as withdrawn, finding that the appropriate remedy lay before the Divisional Commissioner by way of appeal rather than direct High Court intervention. The court granted liberty to pursue the appeal before the proper forum, with time spent in the High Court to be credited toward any applicable limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/5852/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/5852/2026 The Patna High Court dismissed Poonam Dwivedi's writ petition challenging a Land Reforms Deputy Collector's order dated 09.02.2026 as withdrawn, finding that the appropriate remedy lay before the Divisional Commissioner by way of appeal rather than direct High Court intervention. The court granted liberty to pursue the appeal before the proper forum, with time spent in the High Court to be credited toward any applicable limitation periods. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case