Draupadi Kumari vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/6950/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010357232026
e-Filing Number
03-04-2026
Filing Number
CWJC/7842/2026
Filing Date
03-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWJC/6950/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
Coram
Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS, HEALTH SER. ( 5405 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Draupadi Kumari
Adv. Jagdish Prasad Singh,Manibhushan Pratap Sengar,Manibhushan Pratap Sengar, ,Manibhushan Pratap Sengar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.The Mission Director,
-
3.The Civil Surgeon-Cum-Member Secretary,
-
4.The Medical Officer, In-Charge,
-
5.Smt. Renu Jha,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Dr. AnshumanView PDF
Case Summary: The Patna High Court dismissed Draupadi Kumari's writ petition seeking inquiry into alleged illegal money demands and misconduct by an ASHA Facilitator at a Primary Health Centre in Darbhanga on a preliminary objection. The court held that the petitioner had not approached the appropriate authority (Mission Director, State Health Society) before filing the petition. The court disposed of the petition directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Mission Director within 30 days, who must then pass a reasoned order after hearing all concerned within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
03-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/6950/2026
Case Summary: The Patna High Court dismissed Draupadi Kumari's writ petition seeking inquiry into alleged illegal money demands and misconduct by an ASHA Facilitator at a Primary Health Centre in Darbhanga on a preliminary objection. The court held that the petitioner had not approached the appropriate authority (Mission Director, State Health Society) before filing the petition. The court disposed of the petition directing the petitioner to file a fresh representation before the Mission Director within 30 days, who must then pass a reasoned order after hearing all concerned within 90 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts