Mrityunjay Mayank vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/6875/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010353572026
e-Filing Number
02-04-2026
Filing Number
CWJC/7768/2026
Filing Date
03-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWJC/6875/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar
Coram
Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
TRANSFER , SCHOOL SER. ( 2706 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mrityunjay Mayank
Adv. SHANKAR PRASAD ROY,Shambhu Sharan Kumar,Shambhu Sharan Kumar, ,Shambhu Sharan Kumar
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.The Principal Secretary,
-
3.The Deputy Director of Education,
-
4.The District Education Officer,
-
5.The District Programme Officer,
-
6.The Block Education Officer, Mohanpur,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Ajit KumarView PDF
Case Summary: CWJC/6875/2026 The Patna High Court allowed Mrityunjay Mayank's writ petition seeking teacher transfer. The petitioner applied for transfer under Bihar's October 2024 transfer policy citing special circumstances—his widowed mother's chronic illness and distance of 75km from his posting—but received no response. Justice Ajit Kumar directed the District Education Officer and District Programme Officer to process his transfer request and post him to an available vacancy matching his preferences within six weeks, as the State raised no objection to his application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
03-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/6875/2026
Case Summary: CWJC/6875/2026 The Patna High Court allowed Mrityunjay Mayank's writ petition seeking teacher transfer. The petitioner applied for transfer under Bihar's October 2024 transfer policy citing special circumstances—his widowed mother's chronic illness and distance of 75km from his posting—but received no response. Justice Ajit Kumar directed the District Education Officer and District Programme Officer to process his transfer request and post him to an available vacancy matching his preferences within six weeks, as the State raised no objection to his application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts