Mukund Garg vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/5837/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010352162026
e-Filing Number
03-04-2026
Filing Number
CWJC/7738/2026
Filing Date
03-Apr-2026
Registration No
CWJC/5837/2026
Registration Date
16-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION ( 5900 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mukund Garg
Adv. Prasoon Kumar,Amit Kumar Jha,Amit Kumar Jha, Amit Kumar Jha
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.The Principal Secretary,
-
3.The Divisional Commissioner,
-
4.The Collector cum District Magistrate,
-
5.The District Land Acquisition Officer,
-
6.The Circle Officer,
-
7.Devki Nandan Mishra,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: CWJC 5837/2026 - Mukund Garg v. State of Bihar The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the District Land Acquisition Officer, Darbhanga to immediately comply with the Divisional Commissioner's order (memo 276 dated 28.02.2026) to recover Rs. 29,35,385/- in land compensation that was wrongly paid to the petitioner's cousin brother instead of the entitled petitioner for disputed land in Darbhanga district. The court noted the unfortunate situation where despite a prior superior order, the petitioner was forced to invoke writ jurisdiction for compliance, and set a deadline for completion by year-end upon fresh representation within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Apr-2026
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
03-Apr-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/5837/2026
Case Summary: CWJC 5837/2026 - Mukund Garg v. State of Bihar The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition directing the District Land Acquisition Officer, Darbhanga to immediately comply with the Divisional Commissioner's order (memo 276 dated 28.02.2026) to recover Rs. 29,35,385/- in land compensation that was wrongly paid to the petitioner's cousin brother instead of the entitled petitioner for disputed land in Darbhanga district. The court noted the unfortunate situation where despite a prior superior order, the petitioner was forced to invoke writ jurisdiction for compliance, and set a deadline for completion by year-end upon fresh representation within four weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts