Sahil Kumar Singh, vs Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Bihar, Through its Secretary, Advocate - Jainandra Kumar — CWJC/6242/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 06th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 22-Apr-2026

CNR: BRHC010347632026

e-Filing Number

01-04-2026

Filing Number

CWJC/7651/2026

Filing Date

02-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWJC/6242/2026

Registration Date

21-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

OTHER MISC. MATTER ( 13300 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

06-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sahil Kumar Singh,

    Adv. Nivedita Chaudhary

  2. 2.Anup Kumar,

  3. 3.Rupa Devi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Bihar, Through its Secretary, Advocate - Jainandra Kumar

  2. 2.M/s Sri Anuanand Constructions Pvt. Ltd., through its Director,

  3. 3.M/s Surya Nest Build Ltd., through its Director

    Adv. SAURAV KUMAR

  4. 4.Mr. Manish Kumar

  5. 5.Abhishek Anand

  6. 6.Anju Kumari

  7. 7.Mrs. Ananya Agrawal

  8. 8.Mr. Manendra Kumar,

  9. 9.Samrendra Kumar Suman

  10. 10.Mr. Dharmendra Sharma,

  11. 11.Bishwas Kumar,

  12. 12.Dr. Naz Bano Khan

  13. 13.Pranita Kumari

  14. 14.Md. Manzoor Naseer,

  15. 15.Mr. Navin Kumar

  16. 16.Mr. Ashish Kumar Singh,

  17. 17.Mr. Debashish Kumar,

  18. 18.Rinki Sinha

    Adv. Punit Kumar

  19. 19.Mr. Vinod Kumar Verma

  20. 20.Poonam Singh,

  21. 21.Dr. Arun Kumar Sahu

  22. 22.Dr. Nidhi Arun

  23. 23.Mr. Anand Dev

  24. 24.Mrs. Nidhi Kumari

  25. 25.Mr. Awadh Kishore Singh

  26. 26.Mr Shailendra Shekhar,

  27. 27.Mrs. Roop Nidhi

  28. 28.Mrs. Kavita Kumari

  29. 29.Mrs. Poonam Kumari Gupta,

  30. 30.Mr. Niraj Kumar Sah

  31. 31.Ms. Deepti Kumari

  32. 32.Mr. Satyanjay Kumar

  33. 33.Mrs. Laxmi Kumari

  34. 34.Mr. Shashank Mohan Jha

  35. 35.Mrs. Surbhi Ranjan

  36. 36.Mr. Om Prakash Singh

  37. 37.Mr. Ajit Kumar Sinha

  38. 38.Mr. Alok Chandra Jha,

  39. 39.Mrs. Priya Jha

  40. 40.Mr. Rakesh Kumar

  41. 41.Mr. Saurabh Ranjan Shrivastava

  42. 42.Mrs. Monika Kumari

  43. 43.Mr. Kumar Gaurav

  44. 44.Om Prakash Singh

  45. 45.Mr. Sumit Kumar

  46. 46.Mr. Sanjay Kumar

  47. 47.Dr. Aishwerye Singh

  48. 48.Mr. Meena Singh

  49. 49.Mr. Raghvendra Prasad

  50. 50.Mrs. Shikha Anugrah

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Ajit KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC No. 6242/2026 Court Decision: The Patna High Court modified RERA's stay order dated 27.08.2025, allowing the "Surya Signature" project to proceed while continuing proceedings against the original defunct "Capital Centre" project. The court found RERA violated statutory procedures by staying construction without hearing affected parties and without proper application of mind. Key Reasoning: The court held that since petitioners' land (27 decimals, Plot 438) was legally severed from the defunct "Capital Centre" project via a registered deed of cancellation (20.12.2022) and incorporated into the new "Surya Signature" project approved by Patna Metropolitan Authority, RERA's blanket stay was unjustified. The court emphasized that statutory procedures must be followed strictly; where law prescribes a particular manner for action, deviation is impermissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-May-2026

    For Admission III

    Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar

  4. 05-May-2026

    For Admission

    Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    To Be Mentioned

    Mr. Justice Ajit Kumar

  6. 22-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/6242/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC No. 6242/2026 Court Decision: The Patna High Court modified RERA's stay order dated 27.08.2025, allowing the "Surya Signature" project to proceed while continuing proceedings against the original defunct "Capital Centre" project. The court found RERA violated statutory procedures by staying construction without hearing affected parties and without proper application of mind. Key Reasoning: The court held that since petitioners' land (27 decimals, Plot 438) was legally severed from the defunct "Capital Centre" project via a registered deed of cancellation (20.12.2022) and incorporated into the new "Surya Signature" project approved by Patna Metropolitan Authority, RERA's blanket stay was unjustified. The court emphasized that statutory procedures must be followed strictly; where law prescribes a particular manner for action, deviation is impermissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case