Ras Bihari Tiwari vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/6981/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 04-May-2026

CNR: BRHC010345622026

e-Filing Number

01-04-2026

Filing Number

CWJC/7594/2026

Filing Date

01-Apr-2026

Registration No

CWJC/6981/2026

Registration Date

02-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

Coram

Mr. Justice Dr. Anshuman

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

PROMOTION , NON GAZETTED SER. ( 4502 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ras Bihari Tiwari

    Adv. Amarendra Narayan,Ravi Bhushan,Ravi Bhushan, Ravi Bhushan

  2. 2.Akhouri Ramkishore Narayan,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

    Adv. ,Prabhat Ranjan,ANUKRITI JAIPURIYAR 1123

  2. 2.The Registrar General,

  3. 3.The Principal District and Sessions Judge,

  4. 4.The Drawing and Disbursing Officer,

  5. 5.The Accountant General (A and E) Bihar,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Dr. AnshumanView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/6981/2026 Two retired Civil Court employees from Gaya challenged the non-revision of their salaries and allowances under the Assured Career Progression (ACP) and Modified ACP schemes. The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Gaya, to consider the petitioners' pending representation and issue a reasoned order within 90 days, with a provision for the Accountant General to ensure payment within three months if the decision favors the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

  4. 01-Apr-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/6981/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/6981/2026 Two retired Civil Court employees from Gaya challenged the non-revision of their salaries and allowances under the Assured Career Progression (ACP) and Modified ACP schemes. The Patna High Court disposed of the writ petition by directing the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Gaya, to consider the petitioners' pending representation and issue a reasoned order within 90 days, with a provision for the Accountant General to ensure payment within three months if the decision favors the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case