Ajit Kumar Singh vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/8689/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010344072025
e-Filing Number
03-04-2025
Filing Number
CWJC/8361/2025
Filing Date
04-Apr-2025
Registration No
CWJC/8689/2025
Registration Date
20-May-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 6700 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ajit Kumar Singh
Adv. Sunil Kumar Singh,shyamli Kumari,shyamli Kumari, ,shyamli Kumari
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.The Sub Divisional Magistrate,
-
3.The Land Reform Deputy Collector,
-
4.The Circle Officer, Asthawan,
-
5.The Superintendent of Police,
-
6.The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
-
7.The S.H.O. Sare, Police Station,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: CWJC/8689/2025 Ajit Kumar Singh challenged the illegal interference by the Circle Officer and Police (Respondents 4 and 7) in preventing him from constructing on his own land (Khata No. 279, Khesara No. 1910) in Nalanda District, allegedly pending payment of "nazarana." The court disposed of the petition after the petitioner agreed to file a fresh representation before the Revenue/Administrative authorities, directing respondents to dispose of such representation within four weeks with due notice and hearing, concluding the matter expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Jun-2025
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
04-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/8689/2025
Case Summary: CWJC/8689/2025 Ajit Kumar Singh challenged the illegal interference by the Circle Officer and Police (Respondents 4 and 7) in preventing him from constructing on his own land (Khata No. 279, Khesara No. 1910) in Nalanda District, allegedly pending payment of "nazarana." The court disposed of the petition after the petitioner agreed to file a fresh representation before the Revenue/Administrative authorities, directing respondents to dispose of such representation within four weeks with due notice and hearing, concluding the matter expeditiously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts