Subash Yadav @ Subhash Yadav vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/7742/2025
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010333722025
e-Filing Number
22-03-2025
Filing Number
CWJC/8130/2025
Filing Date
02-Apr-2025
Registration No
CWJC/7742/2025
Registration Date
07-May-2025
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajiv Roy
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
LAND ACQUISITION ( 5900 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Subash Yadav @ Subhash Yadav
Adv. Rajeev Kumar, ,Sripriya Sinha
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
Adv. ,PREETY RANJAN,Amresh Kumar 1123
-
2.The District Land Acquisition Officer-cum-Comptent authority,
-
3.The Anchal Adhikari,
-
4.The Revenue Officer-cum-Kanungo,
-
5.The National Highway Authority of India
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajiv RoyView PDF
Case Summary: The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition by 67-year-old Subash Yadav seeking compensation for land acquired by the National Highway Authority of India for highway widening. The court noted that the petitioner had submitted all required documents following a notice dated August 6, 2024, but compensation remained unpaid, and directed that a decision be made and compensation released immediately if the petitioner is entitled thereto under Section 3H(2) of the National Highways Act, 1956, with appropriate interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2025
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
02-Apr-2025
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/7742/2025
Case Summary: The Patna High Court disposed of a writ petition by 67-year-old Subash Yadav seeking compensation for land acquired by the National Highway Authority of India for highway widening. The court noted that the petitioner had submitted all required documents following a notice dated August 6, 2024, but compensation remained unpaid, and directed that a decision be made and compensation released immediately if the petitioner is entitled thereto under Section 3H(2) of the National Highways Act, 1956, with appropriate interest. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts