Mohammad Shahid Wasi vs The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary, — CWJC/6114/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010330602026
e-Filing Number
30-03-2026
Filing Number
CWJC/7224/2026
Filing Date
30-Mar-2026
Registration No
CWJC/6114/2026
Registration Date
20-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Khatim Reza
Coram
Mr. Justice Khatim Reza
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 6700 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mohammad Shahid Wasi
Adv. Md. Hussamuddin Azad
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar through its Chief Secretary,
-
2.The Principal Secretary,
-
3.The Principal Secretary,
-
4.The Collector-Cum-District Magistrate,
-
5.The Superintendent of Police,
-
6.The Additional Collector,
-
7.The Deputy Collector Land Reforms,
-
8.The Sub Divisional Officer - Cum- Sub Divisional Magistrate,
-
9.The Circle Officer,
-
10.The S.H.O.
-
11.Yaqoob Hasan
-
12.Khurshid Hasan
-
13.Muzaffar Hasan
-
14.Zafar Hasan
-
15.Manaur Hasan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Khatim RezaView PDF
The Patna High Court dismissed Mohammad Shahid Wasi's writ petition seeking mandamus to remove encroachment from his land in Supaul district, finding that the dispute is essentially civil in nature. Justice Khatim Reza held that the land encroachment matter—where pucca houses built by respondents nos. 11-15 occupied 18.5 decimals of the petitioner's 41.5 decimal property—should be resolved through competent civil courts rather than writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
30-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/6114/2026
The Patna High Court dismissed Mohammad Shahid Wasi's writ petition seeking mandamus to remove encroachment from his land in Supaul district, finding that the dispute is essentially civil in nature. Justice Khatim Reza held that the land encroachment matter—where pucca houses built by respondents nos. 11-15 occupied 18.5 decimals of the petitioner's 41.5 decimal property—should be resolved through competent civil courts rather than writ jurisdiction. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts