Jagadish Saw vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/6556/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 28-Apr-2026

CNR: BRHC010328622026

e-Filing Number

26-03-2026

Filing Number

CWJC/7191/2026

Filing Date

30-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWJC/6556/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

Coram

Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

SALARY, NON GAZETTED SER. ( 4302 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Jagadish Saw

    Adv. Pramendra Kumar Singh,Niraj Kumar,Niraj Kumar, ,Niraj Kumar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The District Magistrate,

  3. 3.The Deputy Collector (Establishment),

  4. 4.The District Treasury Officer,

  5. 5.The Circle Officer, Barun,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Ritesh KumarView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/6556/2026 Jagadish Saw sought mandamus to compel payment of 24 days commuted leave and 31 days earned leave (sanctioned in June 2019) plus 12% interest. The State's affidavit confirmed the Circle Officer, Barun had already processed and settled all admissible dues, and the petitioner's counsel confirmed the amount was credited to his account in March 2026. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous, finding no surviving cause of action since the relief had already been provided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

    Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar

  4. 28-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/6556/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/6556/2026 Jagadish Saw sought mandamus to compel payment of 24 days commuted leave and 31 days earned leave (sanctioned in June 2019) plus 12% interest. The State's affidavit confirmed the Circle Officer, Barun had already processed and settled all admissible dues, and the petitioner's counsel confirmed the amount was credited to his account in March 2026. The court dismissed the petition as infructuous, finding no surviving cause of action since the relief had already been provided. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case