Umda Devi @ Kumari Umda vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/6139/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226,227. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010324202026
e-Filing Number
26-03-2026
Filing Number
CWJC/7119/2026
Filing Date
26-Mar-2026
Registration No
CWJC/6139/2026
Registration Date
21-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Khatim Reza
Coram
Mr. Justice Khatim Reza
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
MUTATION ACT ( 6200 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Umda Devi @ Kumari Umda
Adv. Ritwaj Raman,Shashi Priya,Shashi Priya, ,Shashi Priya
-
2.Anupam Kumar,
-
3.Pampam Kumar @ Divya Prakash,
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.The Additional District Magistrate,
-
3.The Deputy Collector,
-
4.The Circle Officer,
-
5.Kameshwar Rai,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Khatim RezaView PDF
The Patna High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, finding that it was not the appropriate forum to challenge an order dated 30.12.2025 that cancelled a long-standing jamabandi (land record) without inquiry. The court determined that the Bihar Land Tribunal was the appropriate forum for relief and permitted the petitioners to withdraw the case with liberty to approach the Tribunal, which had commenced functioning on 29.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
26-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/6139/2026
The Patna High Court dismissed the writ petition as withdrawn, finding that it was not the appropriate forum to challenge an order dated 30.12.2025 that cancelled a long-standing jamabandi (land record) without inquiry. The court determined that the Bihar Land Tribunal was the appropriate forum for relief and permitted the petitioners to withdraw the case with liberty to approach the Tribunal, which had commenced functioning on 29.04.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts