Mukesh Kumar vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/5104/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 06th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010319382026
e-Filing Number
24-03-2026
Filing Number
CWJC/6989/2026
Filing Date
26-Mar-2026
Registration No
CWJC/5104/2026
Registration Date
03-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad , Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava
Coram
Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad , Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
EXCISE ACT (STATE) ( 600 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Mukesh Kumar
Adv. Deepankar Raj
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.The District Magistrate,
-
3.The Superintendent of Police,
-
4.The S.H.O
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad,Justice Smt. Soni ShrivastavaView PDF
Case Summary: CWJC 5104/2026 The Patna High Court dismissed Mukesh Kumar's writ petition seeking release of his vehicle seized under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act 2022, along with a reduction of the imposed fine. The court declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction, finding that 1,343.4 liters of illicit liquor were seized from the vehicle during transportation, thereby justifying the seizure and penalty imposed by excise authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
For Admission IV
Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad , Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava
-
05-May-2026
For Admission IV
Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad , Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava
-
30-Apr-2026
For Admission IV
Mr. Justice Rajeev Ranjan Prasad , Justice Smt. Soni Shrivastava
-
06-Apr-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/5104/2026
Case Summary: CWJC 5104/2026 The Patna High Court dismissed Mukesh Kumar's writ petition seeking release of his vehicle seized under the Bihar Prohibition and Excise Amendment Act 2022, along with a reduction of the imposed fine. The court declined to exercise extraordinary jurisdiction, finding that 1,343.4 liters of illicit liquor were seized from the vehicle during transportation, thereby justifying the seizure and penalty imposed by excise authorities. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts