Ambika Kumari vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/6906/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010316412026
e-Filing Number
24-03-2026
Filing Number
CWJC/6896/2026
Filing Date
25-Mar-2026
Registration No
CWJC/6906/2026
Registration Date
01-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar
Coram
Mr. Justice Ritesh Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
SELECTION , NON GAZETTED SER. ( 2502 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ambika Kumari
Adv. Tipuuddin Khan
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
Adv. ,Manoj Kumar Ambastha 1123
-
2.The Director, Integrated Child Development Services (I.C.D.S.), Social Welfare Department,
-
3.The District Magistrate,
-
4.The District Programme Officer,
-
5.The Child Development Project Officer (CDPO),
-
6.The Lady Supervisor-cum-Member Secretary of Selection Committee, in the office of Child Development
-
7.Mamta Kumari,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Ritesh KumarView PDF
The Patna High Court dismissed Ambika Kumari's writ petition challenging the District Programme Officer's order rejecting her appeal in an ICDS matter, accepting the State's preliminary objection that she had alternative remedies available. The court disposed of the petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue the appropriate alternative remedy under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
25-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/6906/2026
The Patna High Court dismissed Ambika Kumari's writ petition challenging the District Programme Officer's order rejecting her appeal in an ICDS matter, accepting the State's preliminary objection that she had alternative remedies available. The court disposed of the petition with liberty for the petitioner to pursue the appropriate alternative remedy under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts