Ram Bahadur Mahto vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/5874/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 17-Apr-2026

CNR: BRHC010313072026

e-Filing Number

24-03-2026

Filing Number

CWJC/6813/2026

Filing Date

25-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWJC/5874/2026

Registration Date

16-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

Coram

Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 6700 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

05-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ram Bahadur Mahto

    Adv. Ram Narayan Mahto

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The Sub- Divisional Officer, Benipur,

  3. 3.The Deputy Collector, Land Reforms, Benipur,

  4. 4.The Circle Officer, Benipur,

  5. 5.Ramanand Yadav,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Khatim RezaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWJC/5874/2026 The Patna High Court directed the Circle Officer, Benipur to complete the land measurement of the petitioner's ancestral property (Khata No.143, Plot No.614, 13 decimal area) within six weeks, pursuant to a 2012 DCLR order that had remained pending for over a decade despite the petitioner depositing the measurement fee in 2012. The court found that the Circle Officer had taken no action despite multiple representations and ordered compliance with the earlier administrative directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 05-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  4. 17-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 25-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/5874/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWJC/5874/2026 The Patna High Court directed the Circle Officer, Benipur to complete the land measurement of the petitioner's ancestral property (Khata No.143, Plot No.614, 13 decimal area) within six weeks, pursuant to a 2012 DCLR order that had remained pending for over a decade despite the petitioner depositing the measurement fee in 2012. The court found that the Circle Officer had taken no action despite multiple representations and ordered compliance with the earlier administrative directive. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case