Ramdev Singh vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/6106/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 05th May 2026.
CNR: BRHC010299622026
e-Filing Number
19-03-2026
Filing Number
CWJC/6462/2026
Filing Date
23-Mar-2026
Registration No
CWJC/6106/2026
Registration Date
20-Apr-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Khatim Reza
Coram
Mr. Justice Khatim Reza
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )
Sub-Category
OTHERS ( 6700 )
Judicial Branch
Judicial Section
Decision Date
05-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISPOSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Ramdev Singh
Adv. Ajay Kumar Jha
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State of Bihar
-
2.District Magistrate,
-
3.District Panchayat Raj Officer,
-
4.Sub Divisional Officer Banka,
-
5.Block Development Officer,
-
6.Block Panchayat Raj Officer,
-
7.The Circle Officer,
-
8.Halka Karmchari,
-
9.Officer in Charge,
-
10.Mukhiya,
-
11.Panchayat Sachiv,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
05-May-2026
Mr. Justice Khatim RezaView PDF
The Patna High Court directed the District Magistrate-Collector of Banka to dispose of petitioner Ramdev Singh's representation (dated 28.02.2026) and any fresh representation with supporting documents within three months, regarding alleged illegal construction of a Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan on his privately-owned land and the unauthorized felling of 70-80 year old mango trees. The court rejected issuing a prohibition writ but instead mandated administrative review of the petitioner's grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
For Admission - Fresh Cases
-
23-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWJC/6106/2026
The Patna High Court directed the District Magistrate-Collector of Banka to dispose of petitioner Ramdev Singh's representation (dated 28.02.2026) and any fresh representation with supporting documents within three months, regarding alleged illegal construction of a Panchayat Sarkar Bhawan on his privately-owned land and the unauthorized felling of 70-80 year old mango trees. The court rejected issuing a prohibition writ but instead mandated administrative review of the petitioner's grievance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts