Parashuram Chauhan vs The State of Bihar — CWJC/5702/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 16-Apr-2026

CNR: BRHC010297922026

e-Filing Number

19-03-2026

Filing Number

CWJC/6419/2026

Filing Date

19-Mar-2026

Registration No

CWJC/5702/2026

Registration Date

15-Apr-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

Coram

Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL WRIT ( 15 )

Sub-Category

OTHERS ( 6700 )

Judicial Branch

Judicial Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Parashuram Chauhan

    Adv. Bhola Prasad

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Bihar

  2. 2.The Collector cum District Magistrate,

  3. 3.The Dy. Collector,

  4. 4.The Circle Officer,

  5. 5.Gyan Chandr Chauhan

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Khatim RezaView PDF

    Case Summary: Parashuram Chauhan filed a writ petition seeking directions to protect his possession and interest over 1 decimal land (Plot No. 301) purchased through registered sale deed dated 06.02.2010, alleging that respondent no. 5 was preventing him from constructing a house using Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana funds through criminal intimidation. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel requested permission to file a proper application before the appropriate authority instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-May-2026

    For Admission - Fresh Cases

    Mr. Justice Khatim Reza

  4. 16-Apr-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 19-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWJC/5702/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Parashuram Chauhan filed a writ petition seeking directions to protect his possession and interest over 1 decimal land (Plot No. 301) purchased through registered sale deed dated 06.02.2010, alleging that respondent no. 5 was preventing him from constructing a house using Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana funds through criminal intimidation. The court dismissed the application as withdrawn after the petitioner's counsel requested permission to file a proper application before the appropriate authority instead. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case